|
Anti competition practices are on the rise, |
Despite having so many imperfections in various markets, few regulatory interventions have been taken by the govt. Consumers are paying a hefty price, emptying their pockets in daily transactions. It is indeed interesting that there are laws and institutions to address market imperfections and erosion in competition. Yet regular functioning of those institutions has not been noticed since the new govt took office.
Bangladesh in 2012 passed Competition Act 2012, which aims "to make provisions to promote,ensure and sustain congenial atmosphere for the competition in the trade, and to prevent, control and eradicate collusion, monopoly, oligopoly, combination or abuse of dominant position or activities adverse to the competition ".It also entailed creation of Bangladesh Competition Commission (Source: Bangladesh Competition Commission,Wikipedia).
Lack of competition can be conspicuously traced in the kitchen market. Consumers feel the heat. Take for instance, the pilaf rice market. The price of packed pilaf rice soared. Some shop owners alleged that big brands elevated the price in unison. Govt intervened by curbing the export quota of the pilaf rice so that price at the domestic market stabilized. The measure has yet to bring any fruit. BCC's intervention is required here to investigate whether any unholy collusion is taking place among the pilaf brands. Unfortunately, no such action is visible from this regulatory body , which was in fact a little bit more active during the interim govt.
Dairy market is another area where the market is concentrated into the hands of few brands. In a bit of surprise, one brand raised the price of milk by Tk 10 per litre last month. Other brands followed suit. Had there been too many brands in the dairy market, this price hike would not have happened. BCC may probe the matter and look into how much market share each brand possesses. In case of mobile operators,we notice how significant market share clause was applied to them by BTRC to curb their influence in the market. Such clause may also apply to the dairy market and a level playing field should be created for new entrants. Unless huge capital investment is required in entering a particular industry, a 25% or 30% market share by a company should set off the alarm bell for BCC. Based on the type of the industry, significant market share may be different for different industry. It is up to the BCC to determine the exact level of significant market share for a given industry.
Mobile Financial Service (MFS) is another market which is dominated by only two operators. MFS has been playing a key role in financial inclusion at the grassroot level. However, lack of competition in the sector clips the benefits and possibilities of new opportunities. BCC can initiate a study on what hinders new MFS operators to expand their operation. Based on the findings of that study, BCC can take steps to remove the obstacles. Since MFS spread to remote areas,ensuring fairer competition and welcoming new operators are major tasks that the BCC must take onus.
Another crucial area that created storm in the press is the oil refining business. Bangladesh Petroleum Corporation (BPC) usually imports,refines, stores and markets petroleum products in the country. Recently two conglomerates step in oil refining business. BPC under the instruction of Energy and Mineral Resource Division of the govt drafted a framework titled "Private-Sector Refined Fuel Import,Storage, Transportation, Distribution and Marketing Policy 2026" in haste. In that framework firms are required to have at least 1.5 million tonnes refining capacity and turnover of at least Tk 50 billion in each of the last three years. Critics allege that such requirements in the draft framework are deliberately customized to provide opportunity to only few big companies, shutting the door for smaller firms. This is a serious allegations that the BCC should pay heed and it should probe whether such arrangement allows participation of few. It is evident from this allegation that such arrangement violates "congenial atmosphere for competition" and allows "abuse of dominant position adverse to competition ". So far BCC remains dead silent.
Duties laid out for BCC clearly spell that BCC can initiate probe on competition-killing practices and activities on its own without waiting for any formal complaint. However, BCC have not played any active role in addressing adverse policy to competition in the incidents mentioned so far.
Eradicating market imperfections is important for two reasons. First, fairer competition addresses supply side constraints,checks unusual price hike and insulates consumers from the inflation. Consumer welfare is best ensured in a competitive market that is justly watched by bodies like BCC.
Second, govt revenue collection target best attained when there is perfect competition. Revenue shortfall is becoming recurrent incident while govt spending is on the rise. Imperfection and collusion in the market contribute to revenue loss. A fairer market may alter the situation by filling the govt coffer to the desired level. A level playing field for all the firms can attain that goal.
We have institutions and budget for them to function. Yet they fail to act when their action is needed most. When various institutions inside the country function to address people's woes, people get some platforms to make their concerns fall to the right ears. People want to see equal opportunities are created for all. This is common in a democratic society. People witness competition-killing incidents on the trot. BCC should wake up and act to make the markets more fairer.