|
Policy rate has many solutions to offer, |
Latest inflation data reveals that inflation rose to 8.55% from 8.48% in July. Constant increase in rice prices,caused food inflation to rise to 9.56% in June , and rise in nonfood inflation from 9.37% to 9.38% maybe the reason for this hike. Rice price in particular increased by Tk 8/ kilo, prompting govt to allow private importers to import rice.
Meanwhile, keeping the policy rate at double digit is still being criticized though it brought down inflation from 11% to current level. The govt is apolitical and it has courage to do this thing before election. Otherwise, popular govt may have difficulties maintaining this kind of contractionary policy amid pressure from various groups. Before election, investors are reluctant to go for new investment and poor private sector credit growth tells all of it. So the timing is good and central bank is doing the right thing though many thought it was wrong.
As I highlighted before, keeping the policy rate high thwarted would-be launderers from taking loans and keeps Taka's value stable. Lowering the policy rate may make central bank's intervention in the foreign exchange market ineffective. With the high policy rate, depreciation pressure on Taka is low, so central bank's intervention in forex market will lead Taka keep a desired value. With low policy rate, depreciation pressure on Taka will be higher as the NPL keeps growing, so forex market intervention may not yield the desired result and wild fall of Taka maybe observed, worsening the passthrough effects of inflation and farther raising the cost of goods and services. Another thing I mentioned in one of my earlier posts is that higher policy rate is helping many ailing private and public institutions and it helps provident fund to grow,addressing the inflation. Otherwise, govt would have to intervene and provide cash to them through printing money or using the bloc grants. The balance sheets of many institutions say ,as the news reports revealed, they made profit through investment in treasury bonds. Again market mechanism addressing the prevailing maladies, when investment prospect and law & order situation is doomed at grassroot level. Recently, I encountered a news report on a public sugar mill[,located in Jhenidah,] bogged down with unsold sugar worth of TK 360 million as market price is lower than the govt set price. The mill is waiting with the sugar stock amid undue payments for the workers. If the provident fund's money is invested into treasury bonds, then by this time workers would take loan from provident fund and may not face financial hardship. They might sell the sugar in favorable time and clear the loans. Govt intervention would not need at all. Moreover, situation like workers [descending] on streets could be avoided.
The 20% tariff is not something to remain complacent. Back in February, no one would imagine such a situation might pop up. But it happened and seriously jolted the macroeconomic situation. We have to accept that WTO is dead and we live in post WTO world. We exactly do not know what will happen in the next two quarters. So there is no reason for being content with the 20% tariff. Rather, we should chalk out contingency plan how to avoid situation like this again.
It is indeed interesting that other countries are imposing [tax] on our exports and remittances while we are charging nothing. I argued several times if we would tax remittances and export(*see "Tax On Remittance: Good Or Bad?", published here on May 20,2025), govt coffer might fill with ample money to provide more private sector credit. 1% tax on remittances and export will bring Tk 4/5 billion revenue , discarding the need for imposing minimum tax on all the TIN holders. Revenue will be used to intervene in the forex market to depreciate Taka in a bid to give incentives and provide private sector credit to banks. There should be two way traffic of receiving incentives and giving tax.
It is indeed a good move to keep the policy rate same as it screens out would-be launderers, improves balance sheet of companies amid stagnant business, keeps the depreciation pressure low, checks cost of production and [reduces] need for govt intervention. 20% tariff does not herald a new dawn rather exposes challenges in a post WTO world where black swan events will be more frequent. We should start imposing tax on remittances and exports to cover the incentives. Preparing and bracing ourselves against the black swan event will prevent the need for Middle Eastern intervention for saving the day.
[*Update: this piece is updated on August 12,2025. The update includes reference to tax on remittance argument.]
No comments:
Post a Comment