I have lost a python,
Representing an era bygone,
From my alphabet book.
They come to the fair,
Leafing book not to brook
Publication deemed don't care
Other people's sentiments.
Teachers' blood, bloggers' blood,
Flooded the path and pavements.
Yet the fair is on and sales flood.
But the door is shut for publishers,
Hailing from other side of the fence .
To groom pure learners,
Textbook by others is an offence.
On how to make better mind
They still take a good look.
I say be kind,
If found, please return
The python to alphabet book.
Curtain of Ekushey Book Fair is about to drop. The state of such a peerless event caused a mixed reaction. Many lament about its glorious past and vibrant years. Others still optimist about a bright future.This pretty old fair still radiates an aura of its fledgling years. Professionalism is not there, amateurs roam around with august writers and veil of protectionism envelopes the mood of the fair.
In recent years a new feature has been added: vice policing has been introduced to check for "sacrilegious contents".
I wrote many posts about the fair. Two years ago I even interviewed stall owners and Bangla Academy officials about the nature of the fair and book sales. Response I got revealed a fair that can be best described as amateurism. Staggering number of published titles is unbelievable, so is the amount of money.
Absence of Kolkata based publishers is another feature of this fair in spite of the fact that 21st February earned the recognition of International Mother Language Day. Kolkata based writers and publishers are popular in this part of the world. Popular dailies here are often named after the novels written Kolkata based novelists. Culture and literature of this country took a direct hit of the ugly face of communal divide. Subtle idea of "us vs them" was introduced immediately after independence and carefully cultivated to popularize a so called " Bengali Muslim Mind" and "Bengali Muslim Literature". This school of thought has gained so much ground in this country that the more ugly face of them managed to amend school text books to get rid of literary works of Hindu poets and writers of undivided Bengal.
In one of my bus rides, I noticed a fellow passenger leafed through an introductory alphabet book(Bangla) for his school going toddler. When I was at that age, I read books where the first alphabet,
"Shareo O", was introduced like this
"Shareo O te Ojogor"("Shareo O" for python).That cute looking, innocent python from my alphabet book is gone. Picture of a boy performing ablutions took its place. Python, from its habitat in nearby forest to alphabet book, finally gave in to the relentless struggle to build a "Bengali Muslim Mind".
Marketing of this concept now pays the dividend. The Bangladeshi publication industry is concentrated into the hands of the few. A decade ago we had various weeklies, dailies and specialized periodicals brought out by various publication houses. Now only few hold sway in that industry. Many writers dominating that industry churn out books, which never make their way into the shelf of their daughters and wives living abroad or taught in English medium schools. Since a great deal of emotion attached to this fair, a ritualistic selling spree does the trick. Rest of the year , you do not see any book review, advertisement of books on key dailies. Even no dedicated book reviewing publication, like the one exists in Kolkata, is brought out by any publication house. When I read popular dailies and books published in Kolkata , I am amazed by craftsmanship and scholarship displayed in those concise sentences imbued with an array of words ( mostly from Persian, Sanskrit and Urdu roots) that you cannot find in any of the contents published here.
They could construct those sentences because they have ease of access to those kind of publications that replenish and shape their minds. Our readers and writers do not have that kind of access.
What we are seeing in literature and publication industry is a new kind of colonialism where most of these writers, whose dear ones hardly touch their books and live abroad, feed the commoners' mind some works that never vie for competition emanating from other side of the fence.
As the oligarchy has reached its peak, we see books airbrushing the history, custom-made publications glutted the stalls. Overwhelming number of book sales did not tell the whole story. I gathered data on published titles and book sold over the last one decade by digging the news reports. In 2008, 2578 titles were published and Tk 20 cores worth of books were sold. In 2018, 4591 titles were unveiled and Tk 70.94 crores worth of books were sold. There has been a surge in books published and books sold in spite of a series of rigid measures like ICT Act amendment, introduction of National Broadcast Policy, banning books deemed controversial to a certain quarter and vice policing. One may question published contents and its type in the face of this fear-mongering steps. I constructed a dummy regression to see whether this kind of intervention reflected in book sales.
Books
i = a
1+a
2D
i+b
1Published
i+b
2D
iPublished
i+u
i
where
Books
i = amount of books sold in the fair.
Published
i = number of books published in the fair,
D
i = 0 when the year is prior to 2013
= 1 when the year is after 2013
Prior to the model, I checked for autocorrelation as the data is time series in nature. Durbin-Watson statistic hinted no autocorrelation. (d= 1.5126 for 11 observations and 1 explanatory variable).
So I did not transform the model and ran the usual regression.
It looked like this
Books
i = 7.368-95.40D
i+0.0046Published
i+0.0305D
iPublished
i
F test( a
2=b
2=0) was found to be significant (F=5.315, p=0.032 for degree of freedom =3,7), insinuating structural change in the regression. However, individual probe revealed that intercept a
1(t=0.159, p= 0.877), differential intercept, a
2(t=0.310, p= 0.76), slope coefficient, b
1(t=0.31, p=0.765) and differential slope coefficient, b
2(t=1.69, p= 0.134) appeared to be insignificant. So there was lack of evidence that structural change took place in the regression equation. Had the parameters changed, then the regression equation finally might look like:
Books
i = (7.368-95.40)+(0.0046+0.0305)Published
i
=-88.04+0.0351Published
i
The stat analysis did not endorse this. So there was lack of evidence to see the differential effect of books published on books sold in the period of blogger killing spree and rigid laws.
From 2012 to 2015, book sold in the fair declined. Those years were politically violent and law & order situation deteriorated.
Whatever the stat says , there is no gainsaying that our publication industry has been going through a degeneration phase. Current veil of protectionism is just the grist to that school of thought's mill.
A regressed society cannot question elites' conduct and whimsical actions. It is a docile instrument at the hands of elites that have little respect for people's opinion and verdict.
New ideas, innovation, urge to change are conspicuously absent in that society. Current state of our society is a reminder that we have already slided into that grim reality.
To build a society that can withstand challenges of the time and to make sure budding minds meet more refined minds, veil of protectionism should be discarded.
Bringing back the python to my alphabet book could be the first step.